"Strava for the gym" and why that frame is the wrong question.
Strava is the world's social fitness platform for runners, cyclists, and other cardio athletes (195M+ registered athletes, by Strava's own figure) with segments, kudos, clubs and challenges. In May 2026 it added a native workout log for sets, reps and weight plus muscle maps, so it does track lifting now; it sits alongside a cardio-first core rather than being purpose-built for strength progression. People searching for 'Strava for the gym' usually want one of two things: a way to share lifts the way Strava lets them share runs, or a serious record of their training over time. Logbook is built for the second, and handles the first through clubs you join rather than a public profile by default. Both apps have feeds; Strava's is open and public-facing, Logbook's is the clubs you've joined in chronological order.
The training record for lifters
The social fitness platform for cardio athletes
Side by side
Honest dimensions, both products. Every Strava (for the gym) row was checked against their own published information on .
On the currencies: Logbook is priced in NZD and AUD above because New Zealand and Australia are our main markets, with USD in brackets. Strava (for the gym) publishes US App Store pricing, so that is what their column shows. Don't read the two columns as a direct price comparison: compare the USD figures, or check Strava (for the gym) in your own App Store storefront.
Prices and features change. Everything above about Strava (for the gym) comes from their own published information, checked on . Check their pages before you decide, and tell us if we've got something wrong and we'll correct it.
Strava (for the gym) and other product names on this page are the trademarks of their respective owners. Logbook is an independent product and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by them. They are named here only to compare the products honestly.
Strava is for cardio. Lifting deserves its own product.
Strava optimises for movement identity. The core unit is an activity: a run with a route, a ride with elevation, a swim with splits. The social layer wraps that, and it's beautifully designed for the job.
Strength training doesn't fit that mould as neatly. A session isn't a route you can map; it's 47 sets of varying weights and reps across 6 exercises, and what matters is how today compares to last Tuesday compares to last August. Strava can record that now, and the 2026 strength log is real, but recording it and building the whole product around reading it back are different jobs.
When people ask for 'Strava for the gym,' they usually mean: 'I want my training to feel meaningful the way Strava makes my runs feel meaningful.' Two answers exist. Social-first, where the meaning comes from an audience (Hevy, Built). Record-first, where it comes from the history itself (Logbook).
Why Logbook's social layer looks different
Logbook has a feed. What it doesn't have is a public-facing one.
Strava's open model works for cardio because other people's routes, paces and segments carry real signal: there's a course you both ran, a hill you both climbed, a comparison that means something. Strength training is more private: my 5×5 squat at 140kg means a lot to me and very little to a stranger.
So Logbook's feed is built from clubs instead: the people you train with, who can read your sessions in context. New clubs are invite-only, new profiles are private, and every finished session asks whether you want to post it or keep it. Public clubs exist and are easy to join. The difference is that joining is a decision you make, not a default you have to undo.
If endurance is your sport rather than something you do alongside lifting, Strava is still the right home. It's the gold standard for cardio social, it has a real strength log as of 2026, its segment and wearable ecosystem is unmatched, and it runs everywhere. In May 2026 it also opened that ecosystem up: 14 partner integrations at launch, Hevy and Fitbod among them, which tells you Strava intends to be the place your strength data lands rather than the app you log it in. And if you want a large public audience for your training, Strava gives you one and Logbook doesn't.
Lifters who also run, and want one history for both without a public-facing feed.
FAQ
- Can I sync my Strava strength workouts to Logbook?
- Not at launch. An import path is on the post-launch roadmap but isn't built. Strava's strength log captures sets and reps, but the two apps model the data differently, so fidelity would vary even once it exists.
- Does Logbook have a public feed like Strava?
- No. Logbook's feed shows sessions posted to clubs you've joined, in the order they happened. There's no public timeline and no algorithmic ranking. Public clubs are the closest thing, and you have to join one for its posts to reach you.
- I do both cardio and lifting. Should I use Logbook or Strava?
- Logbook records both. Runs, walks, rides and sport sessions log with GPS route, splits and elevation, or import from Apple Health, and they land in the same history as your lifting, so a training week reads as one thing rather than two apps. What Strava still does better is the cardio ecosystem: segments, deep wearable and head-unit integration, and a large public athlete community. If those matter to you, run both. If you lift seriously and also run, Logbook can be the only app you open.
Your next session.
Your next page.
Log your sets, look back on your progress and share the sessions you choose. Your personal training journal starts with you.